| | | Description |
The general uses an acceptance-for-value (and hm treasury liquidation) for a court fine, and enforces it's acceptance by the magistrate by using an affidavit of negative averment and maxims of law.....
i used an affidavit of negative averment,
read into evidence so that the judge can 'see' it...(it signed and thumb-printed boldly in red, but was not notarized).
this protocol is based upon the maxims of law:
'it matters not what is known to a judge, lest it be known judicially' but;
'delivery makes a deed speak'
the affidavit contained these and other appropriate maxims of law, rendering it incontestable;
and 'there is no evidence that settlement by accepted-for-value is invalid, and i believe that no such evidence exists'
here is the text, which i have modified slightly in respect of my new knowledge......annotations are in [brackets]....you could possibly get it witnessed by a notary for more punch, but i like to underwrite my own authority.
affidavit of facts by specific negative averment
general of family goodshafting, a living soul, over 18 years of age, being competent to testify and having first hand knowledge of the facts herein, in consideration of the maxims of law, swears and declares under penalty of perjury of the laws of england, that:
1.to swear is to call god to witness and is an act of divine worship [maxim] this document is sworn as truth]
2.i have no evidence that shows that the law requires that to be proved which is apparent to the court and i believe that none exists. [maxim this will become 'apparent' in a minute....]
3.i believe that it is in the interest of the state that there be an end to litigation [maxim]
4.i believe it matters not what is known to the judge if it is not known judicially [maxim], but that delivery makes a deed speak.[maxim]
5.an unrebutted affidavit stands as truth.[maxim]
6.i believe that the burden of the proof lies upon him who affirms, not he who denies [maxim] and i have no evidence that shows that the method of settlement of the account by accepting for value is invalid and i believe that none exists.
7.i have no evidence that shows that money refused does not release the debtor [maxim], and i believe that none exists.
further, affiant sayeth naught.
date: __________________ signed: ____________________
c/o shaft house, shaftington, shaftsworthy, non-domestic without the uk [private residence]
i hereunto set my hand and official seal.
-----------------------------------------------------
maybe a4v the fine, order, statement, etc in advance and allow 10 days to provide a full rebuttal...(written into the affidavit)...then a notice of non-response and opportunity to cure (another 5 days?) then a notice of default ('you have now tacitly accepted the affidavit, thanks)...then if they make a court claim, counterclaim 3+1 x the original sum as damages.
remember the judge needs to be able to 'see' the materials (which is why i read them into evidence)...and you need to be able to prove service and non-response (that is where a notary is good).
| | Tags : Acceptance for Value, freeman liquidation, common, law, freedom, truth, commercial, redemption |
|
